Install this theme

applying for a job at CBST

which is in the meatpacking district

so i’m trying not to giggle

(they shouldn’t hire me)

vladislava:

blowncovers:

“The Gays” Contest: Runner-Up #1 
By Ella German
The overwhelming outpouring of love after Maurice Sendak’s death makes any remembrance of him poignant. Maurice Sendak wasn’t closeted but neither was he a gay activist. We had to talk about whether it would be fair to use his characters to represent gay marriage. But he was, after all, always an advocate for being true to yourself. 

Wild Things under a chuppah!

vladislava:

blowncovers:

“The Gays” Contest: Runner-Up #1 

By Ella German

The overwhelming outpouring of love after Maurice Sendak’s death makes any remembrance of him poignant. Maurice Sendak wasn’t closeted but neither was he a gay activist. We had to talk about whether it would be fair to use his characters to represent gay marriage. But he was, after all, always an advocate for being true to yourself. 

Wild Things under a chuppah!

onegirlrhumba:

lazersilberstein:

maozedongisnotcool:

Mando, you’re way too generous to that sorry shitpile of an argument. Harris’s brand of consequentialism is nothing novel or compelling. And if I recall you’ve previously acknowledged his complete disregard for the cumulative work in ethics and the theoretical and terminological distinctions (pretty sure he just flat-out describes the frightful prospect of engaging with philosophy “boring” - VERBATIM - in a FOOTNOTE). He’s a liberal shithead reading his liberal shitheadedness into his work and maybe we should all collectively ignore the douche until he goes away.

I can’t speak to the logic here, but this man is indeed an Islamophobe and a self-hating Jew (but really more of an anti-Semite).
Fallacious as it is, I’m tempted to condemn Sam Harris to guilt by association, seeing as how he’s friends with Ayaan Hirsi Ali.  Too bad he’s completely ignorant of her life, and in so describing it reveals his Islamophobia:  “She was barefoot in a Somali village, and as a teenager she was someone who thought she herself would put Salman Rushdie to death if she could only find him. And then she became this unbelievable enlightenment success story based purely on her own wits.”  This completely ignores the fact that she grew up middle class in Mogadishu, a very cosmopolitan city, speaking English.  That anyone uses the term “Enlightenment” seriously? Just…yuck.  
I’m ashamed of this Jewish site giving him a platform.  But they’re complacent liberals themselves who like to rack up the page hits.  

“sorry shitpile of an argument” doesn’t begin to cover it.  the idea that science is, in and of itself, an ethical and moral system that can make philosophical and religious thought obsolete is beyond reductive.  there is also a pervasive ethnocentrism in all of harris’ comments regarding the role of religion in people’s lives, and it doesn’t surprise me at all that the content of this interview focuses primarily on judaism and islam — the former of which is a minority religion, and the latter, while being a major world religion, is still considered a minority religion in the West.  for harris, religion is culture, rather than one component of a given culture.  such religion-cultures are imposed upon groups, rather than chosen by them; and, because nuance is useless for someone like harris, religion-cultures are general and universal.  in the case of judaism, jews are “religiously empty” because of the lack of requirement of a belief in god in the more liberal denominations but simultaneously exploit jewish history and culture to “spit on schoolgirls who are not properly veiled”; meanwhile, muslims are all potential terrorists waiting to strike, with the qu’ran’s explicit approval.  particularities of culture and religious practice falls to the wayside, but even a critical practice of religion is suspect, because all religion is inherently false and irrational.  for harris, the only route to moral, ethical, and intellectual freedom is to reject religion in all its permutations and practices in favor of an equally dogmatic faith in the power of science and rationality and a radically individualist standpoint.
it’s…really problematic, to say the least. i don’t currently have time to pick apart the racism, ethnocentrism, misogyny, and islamophobia that infect this piece as well, but all of it is absolutely there and they are absolutely facets of New Atheist thought that those communities of thinkers seem to have no interest in weeding out.

Reblogging again because the commentary is good and i despise this mamzer.

onegirlrhumba:

lazersilberstein:

maozedongisnotcool:

Mando, you’re way too generous to that sorry shitpile of an argument. Harris’s brand of consequentialism is nothing novel or compelling. And if I recall you’ve previously acknowledged his complete disregard for the cumulative work in ethics and the theoretical and terminological distinctions (pretty sure he just flat-out describes the frightful prospect of engaging with philosophy “boring” - VERBATIM - in a FOOTNOTE). He’s a liberal shithead reading his liberal shitheadedness into his work and maybe we should all collectively ignore the douche until he goes away.

I can’t speak to the logic here, but this man is indeed an Islamophobe and a self-hating Jew (but really more of an anti-Semite).

Fallacious as it is, I’m tempted to condemn Sam Harris to guilt by association, seeing as how he’s friends with Ayaan Hirsi Ali.  Too bad he’s completely ignorant of her life, and in so describing it reveals his Islamophobia:  “She was barefoot in a Somali village, and as a teenager she was someone who thought she herself would put Salman Rushdie to death if she could only find him. And then she became this unbelievable enlightenment success story based purely on her own wits.”  This completely ignores the fact that she grew up middle class in Mogadishu, a very cosmopolitan city, speaking English.  That anyone uses the term “Enlightenment” seriously? Just…yuck. 

I’m ashamed of this Jewish site giving him a platform.  But they’re complacent liberals themselves who like to rack up the page hits. 

“sorry shitpile of an argument” doesn’t begin to cover it.  the idea that science is, in and of itself, an ethical and moral system that can make philosophical and religious thought obsolete is beyond reductive.  there is also a pervasive ethnocentrism in all of harris’ comments regarding the role of religion in people’s lives, and it doesn’t surprise me at all that the content of this interview focuses primarily on judaism and islam — the former of which is a minority religion, and the latter, while being a major world religion, is still considered a minority religion in the West.  for harris, religion is culture, rather than one component of a given culture.  such religion-cultures are imposed upon groups, rather than chosen by them; and, because nuance is useless for someone like harris, religion-cultures are general and universal.  in the case of judaism, jews are “religiously empty” because of the lack of requirement of a belief in god in the more liberal denominations but simultaneously exploit jewish history and culture to “spit on schoolgirls who are not properly veiled”; meanwhile, muslims are all potential terrorists waiting to strike, with the qu’ran’s explicit approval.  particularities of culture and religious practice falls to the wayside, but even a critical practice of religion is suspect, because all religion is inherently false and irrational.  for harris, the only route to moral, ethical, and intellectual freedom is to reject religion in all its permutations and practices in favor of an equally dogmatic faith in the power of science and rationality and a radically individualist standpoint.

it’s…really problematic, to say the least. i don’t currently have time to pick apart the racism, ethnocentrism, misogyny, and islamophobia that infect this piece as well, but all of it is absolutely there and they are absolutely facets of New Atheist thought that those communities of thinkers seem to have no interest in weeding out.

Reblogging again because the commentary is good and i despise this mamzer.

A Jew does not believe alone; he or she believes with the community of Israel; and shares an insight of three thousand years of Jewish history. All generations are present in every generation. The community of Israel lives in every Jew. Every Jew, and the individual Jew, can survive only through intimate attachment to involvement in the community.

Abraham Joshua Heschel, The Insecurity of Freedom (via hjordis)

Lane I have a question, do you honestly believe this

idk that I do

Idk. I have read a lot of Heschel, and he always speaks so damn metaphorically. Is this spiritual Israel, we were all at Sinai, etc etc? Or are we all chillin’ at the jcc? He also speaks historically, both with knowledge of history and for his historical moment; Heschel knows that the community (kehilla) has been our mainstay, but things are rapidly changing. Do Jews, as a minority, even have voices as individuals? Blessing and a curse.

(via lazersilberstein)

I usually love Heschel 5ever but you’re right, he’s ridiculously metaphorical. idk what I make of it. The Jewish community makes me want to vomit from my eyeballs sometimes but I wouldn’t trade getting closer to it and further away from the Soviet-bred contempt for Jewishness for the world. Idk how romanticized this is though, it reminds me of that Edmund Fleg “I am a Jew” piece where he’s like, “I am a Jew because in every place where suffering weeps, the Jew weeps” and I’m like, oh is that why I thought it was because I had Jewish parentage tbh

Well that just sounds cheesey as all hell.

A Jew does not believe alone; he or she believes with the community of Israel; and shares an insight of three thousand years of Jewish history. All generations are present in every generation. The community of Israel lives in every Jew. Every Jew, and the individual Jew, can survive only through intimate attachment to involvement in the community.

Abraham Joshua Heschel, The Insecurity of Freedom (via hjordis)

Lane I have a question, do you honestly believe this

idk that I do

Idk. I have read a lot of Heschel, and he always speaks so damn metaphorically. Is this spiritual Israel, we were all at Sinai, etc etc? Or are we all chillin’ at the jcc? He also speaks historically, both with knowledge of history and for his historical moment; Heschel knows that the community (kehilla) has been our mainstay, but things are rapidly changing. Do Jews, as a minority, even have voices as individuals? Blessing and a curse.

pantheonbooks:

“The right understanding of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other.”
- Franz Kafka, The Trial

pantheonbooks:

“The right understanding of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other.”

- Franz Kafka, The Trial

A Jew does not believe alone; he or she believes with the community of Israel; and shares an insight of three thousand years of Jewish history. All generations are present in every generation. The community of Israel lives in every Jew. Every Jew, and the individual Jew, can survive only through intimate attachment to involvement in the community.

Abraham Joshua Heschel, The Insecurity of Freedom (via hjordis)

:(

(via vladislava)

He’s not talking about the state